<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jesus-blog.com/bad-code/bad-code.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jesus-blog.com/bad-code/bad-code.html</link>
	<description>Jesus-blog.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://jesus-blog.com/bad-code/bad-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nathanwhitworth.co.uk/?p=112#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Though a quick comment on what the code would have looked like if you had written it would be nice ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though a quick comment on what the code would have looked like if you had written it would be nice <img src='http://jesus-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://jesus-blog.com/bad-code/bad-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nathanwhitworth.co.uk/?p=112#comment-228</guid>
		<description>hehe that looks like my code from about 8 years ago!

This highlights a downside of opening stuff up to plugin developers, the Open Source project in question is a big enterprise and, iirc, has full time staff, so they could make it decent code with no real effort (assuming they know what decent code looks like) but they can&#039;t without destroying hundreds of plugins

Open Source can be great... but it can also tie your hands</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe that looks like my code from about 8 years ago!</p>
<p>This highlights a downside of opening stuff up to plugin developers, the Open Source project in question is a big enterprise and, iirc, has full time staff, so they could make it decent code with no real effort (assuming they know what decent code looks like) but they can&#8217;t without destroying hundreds of plugins</p>
<p>Open Source can be great&#8230; but it can also tie your hands</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

